Confessions: Wedding Photographer as Wedding Guest

October 14, 2008

This weekend was the third and final time I will have been a wedding guest in 2008. We traveled to New York City for Jason and HyeYun. Although Jason had always said he wanted to hire me to photograph his wedding, as I predicted, in the end they chose a Korean team of photographers to document the day.

I will admit I was aghast at the aggressive style of shooting employed by the Korean photography team [observe]. Two photographers were literally onstage, walking around and getting inches from the couple during important moments of prayer, vows, and ring exchange. The principal photographer (who, incidentally looked and carried himself like a Korean soap opera star) blocked the congregants’ view of the kiss and rings, which is a personal pet peeve, and continuously followed up his very obvious photos by conspicuously checking the image on the back of his camera (we call it ‘chimping’). He even walked between the two mothers who had done the unity candle thing, almost knocking them away from the altar in their elaborate Korean dresses after they had delicately bowed to the congregation… because he suddenly noticed that the bridal party was coming into the sanctuary. In a major moment of faux pas, he stuck his camera over the shoulder of the pastor while the pastor was praying and shot close in at the bride and groom’s face. I was later told that this is a normal way for a Korean photography team to act.

This entire experience caused me to think about being a wedding photographer who was NOT asked to photograph a wedding. As part of my daily routine, I am in contact with large networks of wedding photographers. There are camps on either side of the “will you photograph your friends’ or family members’ wedding?” question (my answer is yes, I would love to… but not for free) and it is often discussed whether as a wedding photographer we would bring our gear to a wedding we attend as guests.

Some heroic individuals claim when they attend a friend’s wedding they just want to drink and dance, and maybe bring a point and shoot camera to take arms’ length selfies with their spouses. Some of us don’t even own a point-and-shoot, and would never attend a major event without camera in tow. A passionate group of individuals, few of us wedding photographers will ever admit to ego issues on the topic of our relationship to images from the wedding day.

I think it’s kind of inevitable… most of us bring our gear to weddings and think in the back of our heads that we’re going to get much better photos than the chump our friends hired, even at times we are determined to take the day off. Since photography is our life, it is natural that we would continue taking photos of our friends as usual and we want to give our photos as a wedding gift, which cloaks our real intentions. Subconsciously, we’re either offended we were not asked to shoot the wedding, or want to save the day if the hired photographer messes up or appears to be doing an inadequate job. Which of course, they always are. And thus we wedding photographers as wedding guests often ironically become our own nemesis… the friend with a camera (or ‘uncle bob’ in industry-standard terms).

I say most of the above tongue-in-cheek – my friends hired talented artists to document their day and I am confident all got beautiful images and albums. I do not presume that I am the best photographer or that everyone should hire me… also, not every wedding photographer has ego issues. My own realization and the point of laying this all out there is to share my self-discovery – I have become more astutely aware of my own ego as a wedding-photographer-turned-wedding-guest. And also more aware of my own dedication to unobtrusive wedding day coverage.

In preparing for the wedding, I decided to bring only one lens. Since I shoot with prime lenses I had to decide which focal length would suit the day adequately. I chose to bring my new 35mm lens which is a current favorite… this also meant that I lost the opportunity for tighter detail shots from far away (such as from sitting in the middle of the congregation during the ceremony). And then I took my personal challenge two steps further by bringing only a 2GB memory card, and then limiting myself to taking only 50 images throughout the entire wedding and reception (even as a guest I go into default photographer mode and usually end up shooting 500 or so on several 8gb cards!!!). I got the 50-frame idea from brilliant Vegas photographer John Michael Cooper, and I actually succeeded in limiting myself… except for blowing the image quota when they busted out the traditional Korean bowing ceremony at the end.

This wedding was a wonderful but mixed experience. As mentioned above, I did have a really difficult time watching the photography team throughout their work. My stomach was clenched and I felt a little nauseous after the ceremony – a physical reaction to the felt horrors of what I was seeing. From my perspective, the wedding threatened to become all about the photographers getting their images rather than a natural progression of traditions and community centered upon the actual covenant and the joy of the couple becoming one. The images I linked above aren’t even the worst – I was limiting myself to only take a few photos and didn’t do the in-your-face photography justice. During the reception, traditional moments were paused, posed, created. This is so different from my own candid editorial style during the course of a wedding, although I did appreciate that they were giving the couple something they obviously wanted and I could not provide (macro shots of the ring exchange, for example!).

wedding photographer overkill

"Wait... where are they? I can't see because there are FOUR photography people in that small room."

Limiting my own camera use was a really interesting and humbling exercise. It forced me to choose my shots carefully. One go at everyone walking up the aisle, only a few images to represent the beautifully choreographed first dance. I did in fact end up dancing with friends during the after party because I wasn’t guarding a bag full of equipment or trying to hide behind my camera.

There were a few images from the 50 that I absolutely adore. And there are 30 images I have chosen to represent the experience from a guest’s perspective. More on that in the next post.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

9 Responses to “Confessions: Wedding Photographer as Wedding Guest”

  1. Krista Photography said:

    As much as I hate to admit it, you hit the nail on the head…

  2. Anne said:

    Isn’t it nice to have the opportunity to observe another team and use it as a reflection on what you would do differently? My sister’s wedding is coming up in a matter of days and I haven’t decided what I’m going to bring, or how much I’m going to shoot – but I’ll definitely be a guest with a DSLR – though not a very intrusive one. I do know that I trust the photography team she’ll have – which I think goes a long way in my ability to enjoy the event as a guest. I don’t really feel like I’d do better – I just feel like I’d cover it differently.

    I think part of this is also a cultural belief. My indian couples have asked me if I’d be willing to climb over people to get the good shot- and I’m kind of assuming that’s the Korean expectation as well (at least for this family). What we might see as obtrusive and off-putting, might be something that the Korean families admire and applaud. Certainly, there are many American weddings where it would be considered highly disrespectful for the photographer to block the view of the guests – and many churches have made sure to implement policies to prevent such matters, but if this practice is considered culturally acceptable to the bride and groom as well as their families, than who are we to impose our cultural beliefs and etiquette?

    I agree a lot of it goes back to ego. Should we be so set in our style and beliefs that we cannot be flexible in how we approach an event? This is neither bad nor good, it’s just something that we need to ask ourselves. Ultimately, the client judges us based on whether or not we’ve met their expectations – which can be very cryptic and hard for them to express- so we have to take extra time to understand what their previous biases and expectations are before we can know if we will be able to meet those expectations. As artists, we definitely are in a position to do a better job if the client’s expectations are in line with our preferred working style, which is why it’s important that we share our beliefs openly- as you’ve done here. There is no right or wrong, better or worse, only differences and preferences that help define our unique vision of the world.

    Wow. Didn’t mean for that to get all philosophical, but it’s definitely a topic close to my heart.

  3. Kate Rose said:

    Enjoyed reading your observations and discoveries…
    ~Katie

  4. rachel said:

    Hi Krista and Katie!
    And Anne, thanks for your reflections. It’s difficult, and in this case was physically hurtful, for me to see such an in-your-face documentation of the wedding, and since I had such a strong reaction I have been analyzing it since Saturday night knowing that some sort of response was needed.

    I consider myself somewhat of a specialist in photographing ethnic weddings since I have been exposed to so many cultures and traditions so far and have studied cross-cultural communication. Though I have photographed several Korean weddings as the hired photographer, this was new to me to observe a Korean team doing traditional style coverage.

    Though this post may come across as negative (as was my response during the ceremony), throughout the day I came to appreciate, once again, that different does not necessarily mean bad. I couldn’t help but think that if it was me photographing the wedding, the photos would be absolutely, irrepressibly different. Those guys definitely got shots I wouldn’t have known to get, because they have specialized in Korean weddings as a niche. We got to see their engagement session photos during the dinner, and they were great…. but apparently they spent a couple of afternoons and several outfit changes with the couple. Just very different from more spontaneous coverage we offer.

    Luckily, there are all kinds of wedding photographers and all kinds of clients. Clients who hire me desire a more candid, fun, and still unobtrusive blend of coverage throughout their wedding day.

  5. Martha said:

    I love your honesty! It’s always easy to point out others faults, not everyone can take the moment to examine their own hearts. It makes us better when we do.
    Love it! Martha

  6. Andy said:

    Very insightful, Rachael. Very interesting.

  7. Andy said:

    Oops, sorry. Accidentally added an “a.”

  8. Marina said:

    i love seeing this POV. such a different cultural toleration level.

    this totally takes the moment out of creating the moment.

  9. jan said:

    i agree it offends our western sensabilties and today’s candid, journalistic photo craze, but it maybe culturally exactly what they wanted and needed. and since it is all about the couple ( except for family) then that is what matters. if they were ok with it and they love the result who are we to judge. and i am not judgiing you for your feelings or this blog, but I think we all get stuck in our own little boxes of thought. i am going to have to try the one lens one card idea at my next event. thanks for posting and letting us read it.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>